(1st. B. Paulet of Hinton)Born: 3 Mar 1585/6, Hinton St. George, Somerset, England
Died: 20 Mar 1648/9Father: Anthony PAULET (Knight)
Mother: Catherine NORREYSMarried: Elizabeth KENN (b. ABT 1593 - d. 23 Nov 1663) (dau. of Christopher Kenn and Florence Stalling) (m.2 John Ashburnham) ABT 1614
1. John PAULET of Hinton
2. Margaret PAULET
3. Elizabeth PAULET
4. Dau. PAULET
5. Dau. PAULET
6. Francis PAULET
7. Dau. PAULET
8. Amias PAULET
The Paulets were Somerset residents from the early thirteenth century, but first sat in Parliament for Devon in 1385. A cadet branch which settled at Basing, Hampshire, rose under the Tudors to the marquessate of Winchester throug Sir William Paulet. The senior line acquired Hinton by marriage in the fifteenth century. John Paulet (or Poulett), first Baron Paulet, local politician and royalist army officer, was the eldest son and heir of Sir Anthony Paulet of Hinton St George, Somerset, governor of Jersey from 1588 until his death, and his wife, Catherine, daughter of Henry Norris, first Baron Norris of Rycote. Paulet's paternal grandfather was Sir Amyas Paulet, the gaoler of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Paulet was noted as ‘a very accomplished gentleman of quick and clear parts, a bountiful housekeeper’, and a keen sportsman.
Paulet succeeded his father, the third of the family to govern Jersey, when he was only 14, inheriting a substantial estate in Somerset, Dorset and Devon. Another Somerset man, lord chief justice Sir John Popham, purchased his wardship. The family circle included Dudley Carleton, whom he visited in Paris in 1605-6. While in wardship following his father's death on 22 Jul 1600 John matriculated at University College, Oxford, in 1601, aged fifteen, and travelled abroad in 1603. Already established in Somerset county society with a colonelcy of militia cavalry in 1608, he was admitted specially at the Middle Temple in Jan 1611.
1610 he replaced Sir Francis Hastings as a Somerset shire knight in the
brief final session of the first Stuart Parliament, but left no trace in
its few surviving records. He retained his seat in 1614 after a
hard-fought campaign against Sir Robert Phelips. Hitherto Paulet had
been a close friend of Sir Robert’s family, and even during the election
campaign he signed letters to Sir Edward Phelips as ‘your son’. He had
entered the lists on the assumption that there would not be a Phelips
candidate, and as late as 7 Mar, the date on which it was widely
expected that the election would be held, he was willing to withdraw: ‘I went out of my doors that morning (as I hope to be saved) with a
resolution that if either I had met Sir Robert or any letter from him,
to have entreated all my voices to cry out for him’. However, Phelips’
persistent failure to clarify his intentions pushed Paulet into an
electoral pact with Sir Maurice Berkeley, and it was this pairing which
ultimately emerged victorious. Despite their own culpability, the
Phelipses deeply resented what they saw as a deliberate snub to their
local prestige. Although they did not ultimately challenge the election
result, and Sir Robert found a seat at Saltash, the 1614 contest led
over time to the polarization of Somerset society between Paulet and
The election ruptured the slight friendship that had existed between Paulet and Phelips, and began a rivalry which dominated Somerset for two decades. Paulet's parliamentary service in 1614 was no more than being named to the committee for the oath ex officio and speaking once on the last day, while Phelips's parliamentary career began in earnest. In 1621 Phelips sat for Bath and Paulet sat for Lyme Regis. While Phelips achieved prominence in 1621 Paulet figured not at all in debate. He did not again attend a parliament until he took his seat in the Lords in 1628, and was there no more voluble than he had been in the lower house.
Both Paulet and Phelips aspired to political power in Somerset, the
former by assiduous and often obsequious cultivation of contacts at
court, the latter by bold and exaggerated defence of the ‘country's’
interests. Phelips's appeal was broader and more populist; Paulet's
more narrowly focused on the county's numerous and prosperous gentry.
There was little ideological distinction between them. Paulet was not
involved in the sedition of Edmond Peacham, vicar of Hinton St George,
among whose papers was found a sermon he had written foretelling the
king's death as a divine judgment. Peacham had been presented to the
living by Paulet's grandfather Sir Amyas a quarter-century earlier, and
Paulet's examinations by the privy council in 1614–15 were merely an
exercise of its routine prudence. Paulet was no more a ‘popular man’ in
1640 than the rest of the aristocracy who realized the regime could not
stop the Scots without a parliament. In their rivalry for local power Paulet and
Phelips divided the county's magnates along lines of kinship
and affinity and of office. Paulet, as the principal deputy lieutenant
to a non-resident lord lieutenant, controlled the lieutenancy; Phelips
regularly carried a majority of the magistrates with him. But they made
no appeals to higher loyalty or to sectarian principles. By the same
token both were substantially indifferent to the larger issues which
were in train towards revolution.
By 1613 he was a justice of the peace, and in 1616 sheriff of Somerset. He was a deputy lieutenant at least from 1624. His social position was reinforced by his financially advantageous marriage, about 1614, to Elizabeth, daughter of Christopher Ken or Kenn, of Kenn Court, Somerset, with whom he had five daughters and three sons.
Paulet's advancement was sudden and considerable. Charles I visited him at Hinton in 1625, and at the King's request Paulet entertained the exiled Huguenot military commander Benjamin De Rohan, Seigneur de Soubise, at Hinton from Oct 1625 to Sep 1626. Soubise, agitating for a major expedition to relieve La Rochelle, was an embarrassment to the King, and his rustication removed him from court. One of Paulet's opponents remarked that the King had ‘committed Monsieur de Soubize to Mr Pauletes custodie, because hee knewe him to bee a good gaoler’. So he was, for Paulet kept Whitehall informed of his guest's restlessness, and when Soubise finally bolted, Paulet despaired. However, largely for his painful service, Paulet was created first Baron Paulet on 23 Jun 1627.
Peerage gave Paulet extraordinary standing in a county with only one other resident peer, one who took no active part in county politics or administration. But it did not save his hunting when the disafforestation of Neroche Forest ended his office as warden there, and his uncharacteristic complicity in popular opposition to the project very nearly brought his disgrace at court in 1631. His command, from May to Sep 1635, of the king's ship Constant Reformation in the Earl of Lindsay's ship money fleet in the channel was gratifying. But the round of personally expensive on-board entertainment and short sallies to force Dutch merchantmen to strike their colours ended with his illness, the accolade of knighthood for himself and his eldest son, John, in 1635 being slight consolation. Paulet's choleric temperament repeatedly caused him to overreact to Phelips's challenges. Even with the court's favour, in virtually every confrontation with Phelips —over the payment of the muster-master, pressing of Phelips's adherents as soldiers, sacking a friend of Paulet as a militia officer, deputy lieutenants' warrants, churchales, disafforestation— Paulet lost, both in the county and at the council table.
In the first civil war Paulet achieved something of an apotheosis. With the militia ordinance of 1642 he withdrew from the Lords, signed the York manifesto in Jun, and joined the Marquess of Hertford at Wells in executing the commission of array. As the roundheads slowly reduced Somerset, Paulet fortified Hinton St George in Sep and put up a stiff fight before retreating with two cannon to Sherborne. In Mar 1643 parliament impeached him for treason while he was in Wales and the marches with Hertford. The Earl of Essex captured Paulet in Oct in Shropshire. After escaping he served under Sir Ralph Hopton, recruiting a sizeable force around Oxford which invaded Dorset, besieging Lyme Regis with Prince Maurice. After Essex raised the siege in Jun 1644 Paulet retreated to Exeter and was commissioner there until the city's fall in Apr 1646, when he was taken prisoner. Thanks to the good offices of Sir Thomas Fairfax, Paulet was treated leniently by parliament, being ordered to pay a £2742 fine, £1500 compensation for destroying Lady Drake's house in Dorset, and an annuity of £200 to Lyme Regis. He was allowed to retire to Hinton, where he died on 20 Mar 1649. He was buried in Hinton, and his memorial is the chapel dedicated to his memory in the parish church.
All three of Paulet's sons —John, Francis, and Amias— were solid royalists.
by Robert Peake
|When he died in 1649, Elizabeth married his old friend and ally
Jack (b. 1603 - d. 1671), son of Sir John Ashburnham (b.
1571 - d. 1620). The ties
between the Paulet and Ashburnham families were further strengthened
when Elizabeth's youngest daughter, also named Elizabeth, married
William Ashburnham, Sir John's eldest son by his first marriage
with Frances Holland.
By the end of the sixteenth century, the family of Sir John Ashburnham had occupied their ancestral home, Ashburnham Place in Sussex, for more than four hundred years. Sir John, however, was foolish with his money, and at the beginning of the seventeenth century he had to sell the estate to clear his debts. Fortunately, his eldest son John (known as Jack) went on to have a successful and lucrative political career, becoming treasurer and paymaster general of Charles I's army and restoring the family fortune. In 1639 Jack regained the ancestral estate, which remained in the family until Lady Catherine Ashburnham died in 1953. Jack later married Elizabeth Paulet.
Sir John Ashburnham
by Hieronimo Custodis
|to Bios Page|
|to Peerage Page||to Home Page|